The Gujarat government has filed a revision petition with the Supreme Court, contesting what it deems as “highly unwarranted” remarks made against it in the judgment concerning the remission granted to the 11 convicts in the Bilkis Bano gang-rape case.
Dispute Over Alleged Complicity:
In response to the January 8 order, which accused the state of acting in tandem with the convicts and being complicit, the Gujarat government has submitted a revision petition, asserting that such remarks contradict the case’s record.
The government argues that the court should intervene under review jurisdiction due to “errors apparent on the face of the record.”
Legal Basis of Review Petition:
The state’s review plea emphasizes the necessity to challenge the judgment based on legal errors and misinterpretations, particularly regarding determining the appropriate government to grant remission.
It cites a previous judgment and contends that the state was bound to comply with the court’s directive despite its initial disagreement with the jurisdictional assessment.
Errors Highlighted in Review Plea:
The petition highlights six alleged factual and legal errors in the January 8 decision. Notably, it disputes the court’s interpretation of consultation with the district judge, arguing that the involvement of another judge should have been considered.
Context of Bilkis Bano Case:
The Bilkis Bano case, marred by tragedy and injustice, represents a significant chapter in India’s legal history. Bano, a survivor of horrific violence during the 2002 Gujarat riots, has sought justice for the atrocities committed against her and her family.
As the legal proceedings unfold, the Supreme Court is expected to review the Gujarat government’s petition and address the disputed remarks in the Bilkis Bano case.
The outcome of this review will have significant implications for the ongoing pursuit of justice and accountability in one of India’s most infamous cases.
Get all the latest news on Indian daily post.